David deangelo advanced dating

Posted by / 12-Jan-2018 06:21

David deangelo advanced dating

Did you noticed a distinguishable difference in the students you ranked during the exercise?

No difference may exist, but most who do this exercise notice the intelligent lack friends. All intelligent people do not have poor people skills just like all unintelligent people do not have good people skills.

I would be able to design robotics and cybernetic systems – the wave of the future. After one year of study with decent marks, I began to see two major classes of students.

The first category of student turned up to few lectures, partied every weekend, enjoyed a great social life, and did minimal work to pass courses.

Now, with the students you have ranked in one category, rank them in the other category.

So if you have ranked the smartest student as a ten in the intelligence category, give the person a rank you feel is appropriate in the popularity category.

Students in school are lead to believe their academic knowledge is the primary determinat of a great job and success.

Howard Gardner in , says that IQ is too narrow to predicate success.

Now that you have several people in each category, think about the difference between the student-types.

Academically intelligent people fail in predictable areas of their lives for predictable reasons.

What makes matters worse is they avoid solving the dilemma because of pride.

I want you to think back to primary school or high school. You don’t need to go through every class member, but recall those at the end of each spectrum.

That is, remember the smartest few in the class and the most popular few in the class.

david deangelo advanced dating-82david deangelo advanced dating-11david deangelo advanced dating-73

The second category of students were intelligent, hard workers, got good grades, and were very focused on their studies.

One thought on “david deangelo advanced dating”